Islamophobia: a non-existing neologist portmanteau

European subsidy-sponge organization ENAR (European Network Against Racism) announces that racism is on the rise in Europe. To be more precise, Islamophobia is increasing dramatically (PDF press release)! Duck-and-cover everyone! But is this really the case?

Of course not!

First of all, Islamophobia is not and can never be racism, since Islam is a religion, not a race. The politically correct money-grabbers of ENAR take the short bus to their work, so are unaware of this obvious fact. But even if this so-called Islamophobia is on the rise, what constitutes Islamophobia? Is there really something as Islamophobia? No, there is not. Just because you can create a catchy neologist portmanteau, does not mean it truly exists. A phobia is by definition”an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something” (my trusted Oxford Dictionary in Mac OS X Leopard). Using this universally accepted definition, a fear of spiders would, in most cases, be irrational, and an aversion to Norwegians would be very extreme (darn Norwegians with their smørbrød!). But a fear of Islam?

Arachnophobia is classified as a phobia because sufferers find it difficult to live normal lives because the fear of even non-venomous spiders is always present. It is extreme and irrational. I don’t know a single person who suffers from Islamophobia, though I know many who do fear the increasing dominance of Islam in the world, and Europe in particular. Is this fear irrational or extreme? Islamophobia would be a real condition if Islam was not the determining factor in every single open conflict in the world today, if there where no forty percent of British muslims who want Sharia law, if the twin towers never came down by the hands of religiously insane virgins, if major politics in European states was not determined by Islam, if Muslim apostates were free to speak out in the lands who where once leaders in tolerance and other enlightened values… if it were not for the teachings of Islam itself.

What is labeled with the misnomer of Islamophobia is, in fact, valid criticism of the state of Islam in our modern society. Criticism that should be voiced, and openly addressed by proponents and opponents of the Islamic tradition entering our societies. It is not a phobia.

And, as I pointed out earlier, labeling criticism as islamophobia is one-sided and unfair, for when are fundamentalist Muslims diagnosed with the syndrome ‘libertaphobia’?

Digg Facebook Ma.gnolia Technorati Twitter Responses Feed

edit

2 Responses

  • P.Saiko
  • December 23rd, 2007
  • 6:39 pm

First of all I agree on the fact that most comments or opinions that are deemed islamophobic are being misnamed, most of the time they’re something quite different at all.

But I disagree on your explanation of the word. I think islamophobia is part of the entire xenophobia-thing. Fear of the other. Though a phobia an sich is an irrational fear, I don’t think xenophobia commonly is. Islamophobia would then be the fear of the other, when thinking of muslims and the Islam in general. Not your fear of their politics, their religion or whatever, but your fear of them being different, and you possibly not being able to understand or communicate.

And there’ nothing wrong with being afraid of somebody or something different than what you’re used to. Fear is an instinctive reflex, the manner in which you react to your emotions are the degree of your civilisation. And initiative inspired by fear seldomly leads to civilised action.

I
  • admin
  • January 2nd, 2008
  • 11:52 pm

First of all a happy new year and an apology for my late reply.

For the most part, I would agree with your comment, but for that I do not believe this really has something to do with xenophobia. It is not so much the fact that many European Muslims are different that sparks fear, or, in most cases, doubt concerning certain aspects of Islam, but the way in which these differences become visible.

Differences by itself are not necessarily harmful or dangerous, unless it is these differences that cause (part of) the tensions putting strain on social-cultural relations within the EU, and the world.

There are, in my opinion, valid critical blows to be made towards Islam. Of course people can defend themselves by arguing that “it is not their version of Islam” (so often uttered in so many different forms, hence the quotation marks), but that does not settle the argument. Jews, Christians, Hindus, Scientologists, Objectivists (a cult, not a philosophy) — you name it, and one for one, they all had to answer to the call of reasonable criticism, too. Sometimes this criticism is voiced in a calm, reasoned way, and other times by sarcasm and ridicule.

Differences are clearly present, such as the difference between the European separation of church and state, and Islam’s call for a theocratic state; the loyalty to a constitution and all the individual freedoms it brings, or loyalty to fellow Muslims in the form of the Umah. Differences like these run deep and addressing these differences does not make one a xenophobe.

(Note: fixed the broken links in the article)

II

Respond to this Post




Everything marked is required.
E-mail is for verification only.